The Inkwell’s Half Hour Challenge for April: “Idiocy”.
Both science and art describe the human condition; tell us about our place in the universe and our relationships with people and things around us. Any work in art or science which lacks reference to the world we live in is worthless. Bertrand Russell tendentiously postulated a teapot orbiting the sun between Mars and Earth. He countered the lack of evidence for the teapot by saying the telescopes searching were not powerful enough. He bogusly asserted his right to “believe” in the teapot, but questioned the benefit that teapot belief conferred on mankind.
Fiction is not history. Both the fiction and the history of Russell’s teapot are equally worthless: neither can tell us anything about anything. Anyone can write a fiction of wild imaginings, starting from a blank sheet, completely unfettered, no rules or constraints, but like the teapot, what would it tell us? We have a rich history of fictions that changed the way people thought about the world. The works of Dickens, for example, shamed folk into action. Could you imagine tales of a cyborg from the planet Zog prompting social change? That is not to say that science fiction is necessarily devoid of meaning (as anyone who has witnessed Captain Kirk spreading American “morals” around the Universe will know).
Are the best writers those who have something to say? If so, it would seem logical to start with a message and then decide on the carriers. You may decide that the carriers best suited to your message are ghosties and ghoulies, vampires and werewolves, elves and goblins, warlocks and witches. But remember: the scariest nightmares are the ones that you believe.
53.182107
-0.610692